How evil are muslims?

Tuesday, November 29, 2005

Here's a small example...



By Don Mackay And Andy Lines
THE sister of a failed British suicide bomber allegedly taunted her pupils days after 9/11: "Hands up everybody who has relations in New York? Well, they're dead."

But supply teacher Parveen Sharif and brother Zahid were yesterday cleared of failing to alert police over their brother Omar Sharif's mission to blow up Mike's Place bar in Israel.

The jury was not told of the alleged comments to primary pupils, which were said to include her boasting: "I'm on Osama bin Laden's team."

Parveen, 37, denied the claims which emerged in pre-trial submissions made at the Old Bailey.

Ruling the evidence inadmissible, the Recorder of London Michael Hyam said: "Although the complaint about what Parveen was alleged to have said was made within a day or two, no note was made at the school or anywhere else as to what she had said.

"It is clear the schoolchildren knew she was a suspect for the offences."

Parveen and Zahid were the first to be tried under laws which make it an offence for those with knowledge of a terrorist offence not to come forward.

The prosecution alleged emails between Omar and his family shortly before the April 2003 attack proved they knew of his plans. It was also claimed Parveen emailed Omar encouraging him to go through with it. But the jury cleared Parveen of incitement.

Omar, 27, from Derby, and friend Asif Hanif, 21, from Hounslow, West London, hoped to become Britain's first Islamic martyrs.

Hanif detonated his bomb in Mike's Place bar in Tel Aviv, killing three people and injuring 65. But Omar's bomb failed to explode. His body was found in the sea 12 days later.

Omar's wife Tahira Tabassum, 29, was cleared of failing to disclose information relating to terrorism at a trial last year. Then, jurors failed to reach verdicts on Parveen and Zahid, 38, both from Derby.

In the latest trial, the jury heard that eight days before the bombing, Omar wrote an email to Zahid.

He said: "Difficult times may lie ahead for you and your family in the next few weeks or months if Allah wills. Plan now and get rid of any material you may consider problematic." In the same email he told Tahira to look after their three children.


He added: "We did not spend a long time together in this world but I hope through Allah's mercy and your patience we shall spend an eternity together."


It ended: "Delete this message."


Parveen wrote a reply a day later which was said to have encouraged him to die for their cause.


She emailed: "Your guarantee is for the eternal life ahead but our soul is eternal. You should not be sad but determined in your aims." She ended: "We will speak to you real soon as we are guaranteed this. There is no goodbyes just a lapse of time. May Allah join us all soon."


Police believed the email meant they would all meet in paradise as a reward for Omar's martyrdom.


But outside court Zahid said: "We did not know what our brother was going to do. It shocked us as much as everyone else and we are still shocked.


"There were many misunderstandings about our religion and culture in this case but people tried to reach out and understand."


Grampian Primary School, in Sinfin, Derby, said: "Parveen worked here through an agency for two days in September 2001.


"At the end of that time, pupils complained about comments she made in class which had upset them.


"As a result, the supply agency was told not to send Parveen again."


Her then employer Select Education plc said: "Parveen's teaching ability has never been brought into question. Parveen accepted the comments were inappropriate and undertook not to repeat them."

Offensive?

Thursday, November 24, 2005

Last month, Governor Mitt Romney of Massachusetts suggested that since virtually every terrorist attack around the world has been carried out by Muslims, it might behoove us to listen in on what is being preached in American mosques.

Strict Islamic countries find women wearing white socks sexually provocative and offensive. Pictures of humans or animals are offensive and men who shave their faces are offensive. Card playing is offensive. Girls attending school and receiving an education are also offensive. Women who vote are also offensive.

A woman daring to leave her home without permission even to rush her sick child to a doctor is offensive. Of course, female doctors are offensive so any woman requiring medical care can’t receive it because all the doctors are men.


Islamics also seem to be offended by: America, Great Britain, Poland, Israel, Australia, Spain, Italy, Japan, Russia, and New Zealand, just to mention a few countries. Interestingly, Islam doesn’t seem to be as offended by France or Germany.

In fairness, what Islam doesn’t find offensive should be examined. Many Muslims did not find the murder of 3000 people on 9/11 offensive. Saddam Hussein, responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands fellow Muslims, was not offensive. Forbidding the practice of other religions in an Islamic country is not offensive while daring to question what might be going on inside a mosque in America, is terribly offensive.

The murder of thousands of Iraqi Muslims doesn’t seem to offend Islamics, as long the killing is being done by other Muslims. If an American soldier kills a Muslim trying to kill him, that is offensive. The beheading of helpless prisoners by “freedom fighters” is not offensive. Putting mass murderers in a prison camp that provides good food, allows time to pray, provides copies of the Quran and prayer rugs, gives medical and dental care, and allows Islamic clerics to provide the prisoners with religious council, is offensive.

The Quran touching the floor is offensive but urinating on or burning the Bible is not. Profiling people from Islamic countries that support terrorism is offensive but imprisoning Christians for wearing a cross is not.

Teaching people about Islam is encouraged, but teaching Christianity is a beheading offense.

Islamics are not offended when Omar Ahmad, co-founder of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, declares that it is the goal of CAIR to replace our Constitution with the Quran and is incensed if Americans are offended. After all, that is being disrespectful of the Quran. Any American who does not want the Quran replacing the Constitution and who speaks out against Islam is immediately labeled an “Islamaphobe.” When Islam is involved, there is no freedom of speech.

Another thing that doesn’t seem to offend many Muslims is the killing of a ten-year-old rape victim. She must have been “asking for it.” The little vixen soiled the family name and was probably wearing white socks. Also not offensive is the stoning to death of women who are merely suspected of “being with a man not their husband.” Hanging college students who dare to speak out against oppressive and cruel ayatollahs isn’t offensive to many Muslims either.

Muslims are not offended by the age-old Islamic tradition of forcing their young daughters to marry their 60-year-old uncles. Girls as young as 12 are forced to marry their cousins and occasionally even their half-brothers. This is done to keep the family money in the family. However, this practice also produces the genetic defects caused by constant inbreeding.

What Americans should find offensive is how the media, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), CAIR, and American leftists recoil in horror if a cruel word is said about Islam as they all set about the business of destroying our own Christian-based society. As socialists and atheists slowly remove all traces of God from America, Islamics are standing ready to fill the void with Allah and Islamic law. Any American who doesn’t believe that we are war with Islam isn’t paying attention.

Americans need to wake up from their liberal-media and television-induced stupor. CAIR and the ACLU do not represent American culture but they are both being allowed to destroy it. That offends me. It should offend you.

Muslims in power (shudder...)

Tuesday, November 22, 2005


This article was written a few years ago but is especially prescient now that so many muslims long for an islamic "government". A typical muslim women had this to say on another blog: "Islam is the solution" sounds right to me. Why is it assumed that "democracy is the solution"? As a Muslim, I don't have any particular desire for a democratic state.




by Shauna Lambrecht


The woman of Afghanistan see the world through a swatch of mesh. In September of 1994, a group of religious young men from Pakistan, the "Taliban," led by Mullah Mohammad Omar, appeared on the Afghanistan political scene. They gave the impression that they had come to rid Afghanistan of corruption and disorder. The Taliban attacked and captured provinces until they got to the capital Kabul. After nine-months and 231 bombs the Afghanistan government surrendered. The Taliban claim to follow a pure, fundamentalist Islamic ideology, yet they display harsh oppression against women. Within Islam, women are allowed to earn and control their own money and participate in public life.

Women in Afghanistan, under Taliban rule, were confined to their homes unless a close male relative escorted them. Women must wear a "burqa," and may not speak in public; their escorts must speak for them so they do not excite the males with the sound of their voices.

At age eight, girls are not allowed to attend school. In 1996, women were outlawed from owning businesses. Those that did were told to shut them down. In Afghanistan, 70 percent of school teachers, 50 percent of government officials and 40 percent of the doctors were women prior to 1996.

A male physician cannot treat women, yet at the same time, very few women are allowed to practice medicine. Many women and young girls died of treatable ailments because they were prohibited from being treated by a male doctor or being placed in hospitals where males are present. Instead, women were placed in small dirty clinics where there is no running water. Their supper come at six every night in a wheelbarrow. In the only maternity hospital, most women deliver their children on the floor or double up in a twin bed with another expectant mother. Several women tried to commit suicide by drinking household cleaner: they would rather die than live in these horrible conditions. Surveyed by Physicians for Human Rights, 97 percent of Afghan women exhibit signs of suffering major depression.

Women had to paint all of the first floor windows black in their homes, so men couldn’t look inside. They had to have black curtains along the windows of the buses that they rode in so that no one could look inside.

Every Friday, people gathered in the city of Kabul to watch the public whippings, stonings, amputations and executions of people who had dared to oppose the Taliban. Several Internet reports and magazines articles expose the Taliban’s cruelty. One elderly woman was walking when her ankle showed from underneath her burqua. The "religious police" saw her and broke her ankle with a metal cable. A woman tried to flee Afghanistan with a male who was not her close relative and was stoned to death for adultery. One woman dared to disobey the Taliban by teaching little girls in her own home. They shot her in front of her husband, daughter and students.

All of these crimes brought to you in the name of the Religion of Peace™

Saudi jailed for not hating Jews

Wednesday, November 16, 2005


Saudi jailed for discussing the Bible
Washington Times

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (Reuters) -- A court sentenced a teacher to 40 months in prison and 750 lashes for "mocking religion" after he discussed the Bible and praised Jews, a Saudi newspaper reported yesterday.

Al-Madina newspaper said secondary-school teacher Mohammad al-Harbi, who will be flogged in public, was taken to court by his colleagues and students.

He was charged with promoting a "dubious ideology, mocking religion, saying the Jews were right, discussing the Gospel and preventing students from leaving class to wash for prayer," the newspaper said.

Saudi Arabia, the birthplace of Islam, strictly upholds the austere Wahhabi school of Islam and bases its constitution on the Koran and the sayings of the prophet Muhammad. Public practice of any other religion is banned. [..]

The Queen of England is "an enemy of Islam"

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

J. Grant Swank, Jr.

2005/11/15

The Queen of England is "an enemy of Islam," according to Al-Qaeda. She, like all other infidels, must be slain.

According to "Mohammad Sidique Khan, ringleader of the London bombings that killed 52 commuters from Mohammad Sidique Khan, ringleader of the London bombings that killed 52 commuters," all non-Muslims must be slaughtered. That is reported by Abul Taher in Times On Line.

Khan states: "’It is very clear, brothers and sisters, that the path of jihad and the desire for martyrdom is embedded in the holy prophet and his beloved companions.

"’By preparing ourselves for this kind of work, we are guaranteeing ourselves for paradise and gaining the pleasure of Allah.

"’And by turning our back on this work, we are guaranteeing ourselves humiliation and the anger of Allah. Jihad is an obligation on every single one of us, men and women.’"

There you have it. It is the Islamic call to worldwide rule in the name of the Koran’s Allah. In order to rule, Muslims must have no planetary inhabitants but themselves, cowardly Muslims excluded by being executed along with the non-Muslims.

This Khan mandate is stated in the context of cowardly Muslims in England giving allegiance to the Queen rather than bowing down solely to the Islamic deity. That is abhorrent to the likes of Khan; therefore, the Muslims now residing in England must be taught a lesson. They must fall in line with killing off non-Muslims, which would include the Queen, and thus set up Islamic rule in all of England . The Queen must go. Allah must rule from her throne in her place.

Al-Qaeda has gone so far as to state that the Queen is the "severest enemy of Islam." This is broadcast in a video message "justifying the July bombings in London ."

Here and there across the globe, insane Muslims are corralling their own cultists into killing off the masses. These crazies then move into such Muslim nations as Jordan to press the point. They move into a Muslim wedding feast to underline their ambition as being supreme.

This is World War III. It is held in various unpredictable locales. It is seen through by warriors dressed in wedding attendees’ garb. It is a whole different mode of combat. Nevertheless, it is just as real and deadly.

Finally, with the Jordanian massacre, the Muslims leaders such as the Jordanian King are castigating their own. It is time, long overdue time. Far past real-time in real-life. Nevertheless, peace-peoples are happy that at last somebody belonging to the Islamic clique is speaking out against Islamic killers international. Time will tell if their voices increase in volume and number. Don’t count on it being a wild surge for peace. Nevertheless, in these confusing times anything is possible.

Obviously with the Queen of England under attack, every democracy leader of every freedom-based country is under attack. It is merely a matter of time until there is an assassination and then a number of them dominoing the hellish craze of Islamic slaughterers who thrill at blood in the streets.

That is why France is wise to inform the public that Muslim rioters will be deported promptly. The British lawmakers were amiss in not supporting British Prime Minister Tony Blair in his efforts to corral the social destroyers by putting them away for at least a 90-day period while investigations were undergoing.

The United States has been walking the fine line in not wanting to incite Muslim riots and at the same time having the President refer to Islam as "an ideology of hate." Blair has called it an "evil ideology." Yet on the other hand, Mr. Bush placed the Koran in the White House library for the first time at which time he invited Muslims to a dinner in the White House. Laura Bush met in another room with Muslim women to celebrate the occasion.

So it appears that national leaders don’t know what to do to stave off the Muslim killers. They placate them. They threaten them. They deport them. They tolerate them. They pat them on the back. They smile at them. They scowl at them.

All the while the Queen sits upon her throne — in danger.

Five good questions...

Sunday, November 13, 2005



Some excellent questions posed of Muslims by radio host Dennis Prager.


(1) Why are you so quiet?
Since the first Israelis were targeted for death by Muslim terrorists blowing themselves up in the name of your religion and Palestinian nationalism, I have been praying to see Muslim demonstrations against these atrocities. Last week's protests in Jordan against the bombings, while welcome, were a rarity. What I have seen more often is mainstream Muslim spokesmen implicitly defending this terror on the grounds that Israel occupies Palestinian lands. We see torture and murder in the name of Allah, but we see no anti-torture and anti-murder demonstrations in the name of Allah.

There are a billion Muslims in the world. How is it possible that essentially none have demonstrated against evils perpetrated by Muslims in the name of Islam? This is true even of the millions of Muslims living in free Western societies. What are non-Muslims of goodwill supposed to conclude? When the Israeli government did not stop a Lebanese massacre of Palestinians in the Sabra and Chatilla refugee camps in Lebanon in 1982, great crowds of Israeli Jews gathered to protest their country's moral failing. Why has there been no comparable public demonstration by Palestinians or other Muslims to morally condemn Palestinian or other Muslim-committed terror?

(2) Why are none of the Palestinian terrorists Christian?

If Israeli occupation is the reason for Muslim terror in Israel, why do no Christian Palestinians engage in terror? They are just as nationalistic and just as occupied as Muslim Palestinians.

(3) Why is only one of the 47 Muslim-majority countries a free country?

According to Freedom House, a Washington-based group that promotes democracy, of the world's 47 Muslim countries, only Mali is free. Sixty percent are not free, and 38% are partly free. Muslim-majority states account for a majority of the world's "not free" states. And of the 10 "worst of the worst," seven are Islamic states. Why is this?

(4) Why are so many atrocities committed and threatened by Muslims in the name of Islam?

Young girls in Indonesia were recently beheaded by Muslim murderers. Last year, Muslims — in the name of Islam — murdered hundreds of schoolchildren in Russia. While reciting Muslim prayers, Islamic terrorists take foreigners working to make Iraq free and slaughter them. Muslim daughters are murdered by their own families in the thousands in "honor killings." And the Muslim government in Iran has publicly called for the extermination of Israel.

(5) Why do countries governed by religious Muslims persecute other religions?

No church or synagogue is allowed in Saudi Arabia. The Taliban destroyed some of the greatest sculptures of the ancient world because they were Buddhist. Sudan's Islamic regime has murdered great numbers of Christians.

Instead of confronting these problems, too many of you deny them. Muslims call my radio show to tell me that even speaking of Muslim or Islamic terrorists is wrong. After all, they argue, Timothy McVeigh is never labeled a "Christian terrorist." As if McVeigh committed his terror as a churchgoing Christian and in the name of Christ, and as if there were Christian-based terror groups around the world.

2 million fewer potential jihadis

Saturday, November 12, 2005

While I'm an agnostic and view all religion with the same jaundiced eye, Orthodox Christians are at least taught to love each other. That's opposed to the islamic perspective of insulting and killing non-muslims. Religion of peace dontchaknow...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Interfax

2005/11/02

Moscow, November 1, Interfax - The number of ethnic Muslims in Russia who adopted Christianity is 2 million, while the number of the Orthodox who have been converted to Islam is only 2,5 thousand, stated Roman Silantyev, executive secretary of the Inter-religious Council in Russia.

‘Christianization happens not so much as a result of some purposeful missionary activity (in which only Protestants are engaged) as under the influence of Russian culture which has express Christian roots’, Silantyev said in a interview published this week by the Itogi weekly.

According Silantyev, the converts are predominantly Muslims by birth, while ‘those who really confess Islamic values and attend mosque on a regular basis rarely change their faith’.

‘The assimilation of ethnic and religious minorities is an inevitable process in any society. In Russia it is accelerated due to extremist activities’, the Islamic researcher believes.

For instance, he says, as a result of what happened in Beslan, the proportion of Muslims in North Ossetia has decreased at least by 30%, while in Beslan itself, where Muslims had comprised from 30 to 40% of the population, their number has decreased at least by half.

‘As even Muslim sources confirm, after each terrorist action, thousands and may be even dozens of thousands of ethnic Muslims adopt baptism’, Silantyev stated.

At the same time, the expert accounts for the small number of ethnic Orthodox people who have adopted Islam for the last 15 years, among other things, by the fact that ‘for some reason Russians seem to be more willing to join sects than Islam’.

Allah's minions execute 57

Thursday, November 10, 2005




Suicide Bombers Kill 57 at Jordan Hotels.

AMMAN, Jordan - Suicide bombers carried out nearly simultaneous attacks on three U.S.-based hotels in the Jordanian capital Wednesday night, killing at least 57 people and wounding 115 in what appeared to be an al-Qaida assault on an Arab kingdom with close ties to the United States.

The explosions hit the Grand Hyatt, Radisson SAS and Days Inn hotels just before 9 p.m. One of the blasts took place inside a wedding hall where 300 guests were celebrating — joined by a man strapped with explosives who had infiltrated the crowd. Black smoke rose into the night, and wounded victims stumbled from the hotels.

“We thought it was fireworks for the wedding but I saw people falling to the ground,” said Ahmed, a wedding guest at the five-star Radisson who did not give his surname. “I saw blood. There were people killed. It was ugly.”

Jordan’s deputy prime minister, Marwan Muasher, said nobody claimed responsibility but that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the Jordanian-born leader of al-Qaida in Iraq, was a “prime suspect.”

Scumbag muslim mom...

Tuesday, November 08, 2005


TORONTO (CP) - The mother of a Canadian teenager charged with murder and held at Guantanamo Bay accused Americans of acting like gods Tuesday and slammed Ottawa for doing nothing to help her son.

In an interview with The Canadian Press, Maha Elsamnah lashed out at both Washington and Canada's federal government over the detention and treatment of her Toronto-born son, Omar Khadr, 19, who faces the death penalty if convicted by a special U.S. military tribunal. "The Americans are gods now," Elsamnah said from her east-end Toronto home.

(this from Jew-hating, Osama-loving sack of islamic crap. Why would we give a fig for what this dung beetle thought about anything?)

"The Americans can do anything. They make the law. Nobody can tell them anything. Nobody can disagree with them."

Khadr was just 15 when he allegedly threw a hand grenade that killed an American soldier and wounded another during a firefight with Taliban fighters in Afghanistan in July 2002.

He arrived in Guantanamo Bay as a 16-year-old, the youngest enemy combatant detained there, and has been held at the base on Cuba amid accusations from supporters that he has been tortured.

"The Canadians have not been trying anything," said Elsamnah. "Ottawa is allied to the Americans, so what do you expect?"

(I expect the Americans to give this little jihadi due process - which is a lot more than muslims give to their enemies...)

What do rioting muslims want?

Sunday, November 06, 2005

Someone on my blog referred to the latest muslim uprising in Paris as a "stupidfada" - essentially imitating the lust for violence predominant in Palestine. The question is, what do French muslims want? What will make them stop rioting? Here’s a short list - feel free to add your own:

• Clitorectomy’s for all muslim girls should their parents request them (paid for by the French medical system of course);
• the right to wear the burka or head scarf wherever and whenever they want;
• the extension of the Islamic territory across the globe, and the establishment of a worldwide ‘caliphate' founded on Shari'a law;
• the right to gang-rape non-muslim women and girls or muslim women in their territory who refuse to properly cover up;
• the removal of all non-islamic churches and religious artifacts in their territory – they are offensive to them;
• halal food in every restaurant in France;
• the cessation of the wine industry;
• islam taught in every school
• tax breaks for muslims;
• ???

The new Burka?

Muslims pour gas on disabled - light fire...

Friday, November 04, 2005

From the "why am I not surprised" category - Muslims rampaging in the Paris suburb of Sevran poured gasoline on a handicapped woman and set her on fire.

A handicapped woman was doused with petrol and set on fire by youths during another night of rioting in Paris.

The 56-year-old suffered third degree burns to 20% of her body in the attack.

Witnesses said a youth poured petrol over the woman and then threw a Molotov cocktail on to the bus she was travelling on in the suburb of Sevran.

Other passengers were able to flee but she was unable to escape because of her disabilities.

Religion of peace dontchaknow...

Are all muslims Jew-haters?

Thursday, November 03, 2005

The twaddle below was taken from an American muslims blog complaining that the world recognises the Holocaust. And this sick fuck claims he's a "moderate".

I think this is unjust. A "Holocaust Day"? As if the slaughter of Jews deserves special recognition that the slaughter of American Indians does not? How about Armenians, Bosnian Muslims, or Tutsis in Rwanda? Why does this one incident in human history always get special recognition? Wouldn't have a "Anti-Genocide Day" have been a better idea?

I know, some people out there might call me an anti-Semite for voicing such ideas and thoughts, but so be it. To many out there ANY words, written or spoken that are critical of Israel or Jews are anti-Semitic. But this isn't the case and I reject this idea.

The Holocaust has become and industry for certain groups and people. They use it to make money, they use to silence people, they use it to bully people, political parties, and in certain cases entire nations. To this day the German people are stilling paying reparations and providing military and political support to Jews and the people of Israel. Why? How many Germans alive today had anything to do with the Nazi death machine and why should people not involved be required to give into what is nothing more than collective punishment?

I am COMPLETELY against a "Holocaust" day and would only support a day that does not single out the trials of a single group over another.

8 year old boy - tortured by islam...

Tuesday, November 01, 2005






As if the sick fucks that make up the ROP couldn't get any lower - along comes these disturbing photos of a young boy who had been caught stealing bread in Iran. Sharia demands punishment and the bearded muslim asswipe seen here can't contain his glee as he slowly rolls a jeep over this childs arm.

The stink of islam strikes again...

 
 
 
 
Copyright © The Flanstein